Geographers of art are concerned with where art—architecture, painting, and sculpture—is or was located, and how material and indigenous culture shaped the human environment and the nature of human civilization. ‘The ready enrolment of geographic discourses within art world critiques, and how geographers’ own expanding fields of practice have come to intersect with those of art’ (Hawkins (2013) PHG. 37, 1, 52). This may include: paying close attention to landscape; the layers of social and cultural meaning and power that could be discerned via visual interpretation and contextual investigation of symbolic imagery (D. Cosgrove and S. Daniels 1988); geographical understandings of art and other definitions of environment, often through a focus on monumental forms that have centred interpretations of art in urban spaces and the role of art in urban regeneration (Hall and Robertson (2001) Landscape Res. 26, 1, 5) and place promotion; and the variety of ways in which people’s experiences, knowledge, and exploration of the environments which surround them may be understood through embodied–sensuous experience. See Cant and Harris (2006) Soc. & Cult. Geog. 7, 6, 857.